“Just Be Yourself”
“Circumcised or Intact?!” Screw Her Preference!
Women: Career or Romance, Choose Your God
Dealing with a Breakup: 10 Tips for Men
29 Reasons Nightclubs Suck
Ladder Theory: Revised and Revisited
‘Understanding Women:’ A Book I’d Like to Destroy
Why Women Ruin Their Husband’s Friendships
Canada’s Marriage Fraud Crackdown
Mrs. Control Freak and Mr. Spineless Eat Out
Trunk’s Hypocritical, “Immature and Selfish” Take on Divorce
Jail for Facebook Rant about “Evil” Ex-Wife
Cheating Military Wife Wants it All
Alpha Redux?
40
Liz says:
April 1, 2015 at 10:16 am
“Let’s just print a bunch of dollar bills and pay our national debt with it. I’m sure there will be no consequences. Don’t tell me printing more money causes more inflation: I already established that “money” is an artificial term. And don’t even get me started on “inflation”: bunch of people making up words all the time to advance their political beliefs
^Above is the logic that results when you dismiss entire categories of words because you don’t like dealing with marginal cases.”
You scoff, but this is an actual, no-kidding, “theory” espoused in the “new economy”. Here’s a paper related to the subject: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001070
I plan on getting in while the getting is good! Printing some Lizbucks right now!
;-)
41
Jeremy says:
April 1, 2015 at 10:21 am
@Liz, unlike many proponents of MBTI, I do not believe certain personalities inherently mesh best with certain others. Helen Fisher believes that SPs match best with SPs, SJs with SJs, and NFs with NTs. She says that because statistically, that seems to be the average pattern of attraction. In other words, these statistics are descriptive rather than prescriptive. But there’s no gospel truth to it, nor would it be accurate to say that any particular match is inherently doomed or better.
“Circumcised or Intact?!” Screw Her Preference!
Women: Career or Romance, Choose Your God
Dealing with a Breakup: 10 Tips for Men
29 Reasons Nightclubs Suck
Ladder Theory: Revised and Revisited
‘Understanding Women:’ A Book I’d Like to Destroy
Why Women Ruin Their Husband’s Friendships
Canada’s Marriage Fraud Crackdown
Mrs. Control Freak and Mr. Spineless Eat Out
Trunk’s Hypocritical, “Immature and Selfish” Take on Divorce
Jail for Facebook Rant about “Evil” Ex-Wife
Cheating Military Wife Wants it All
Alpha Redux?
40
Liz says:
April 1, 2015 at 10:16 am
“Let’s just print a bunch of dollar bills and pay our national debt with it. I’m sure there will be no consequences. Don’t tell me printing more money causes more inflation: I already established that “money” is an artificial term. And don’t even get me started on “inflation”: bunch of people making up words all the time to advance their political beliefs
^Above is the logic that results when you dismiss entire categories of words because you don’t like dealing with marginal cases.”
You scoff, but this is an actual, no-kidding, “theory” espoused in the “new economy”. Here’s a paper related to the subject: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001070
I plan on getting in while the getting is good! Printing some Lizbucks right now!
;-)
41
Jeremy says:
April 1, 2015 at 10:21 am
@Liz, unlike many proponents of MBTI, I do not believe certain personalities inherently mesh best with certain others. Helen Fisher believes that SPs match best with SPs, SJs with SJs, and NFs with NTs. She says that because statistically, that seems to be the average pattern of attraction. In other words, these statistics are descriptive rather than prescriptive. But there’s no gospel truth to it, nor would it be accurate to say that any particular match is inherently doomed or better.