No Sex Before Marriage
Attraction: It’s About The Energy
A Scandalous You!
Are You Single? A Simple Yes Or No.
At What Age Will You Settle?
Avoiding the Superman Complex
Bar (Fly) on a Wall
Be Selfish in Love and Ask for What You Want and Need
It confuses men because many times, women will call both Eddie AND Alpha “attractive”, for the reasons we’ve set out here (mainly, not wanting to be judged as shallow, bitchy or superficial).
26
Morpheus says:
January 13, 2015 at 6:43 pm
Supposing ten random men wearing the same outfit stood in a lineup in front of me, my estimation of who was “best looking” would be entirely different then under different situational contexts. Men actually become more physically attractive in my estimation (or less so) depending. A physically good looking guy at first glance might repulse me once I get to know him, and the less classically handsome guy look like the handsomest man ever…if he has a lot of attractive personality traits. There really is no reason for me to lie about this.
This basically makes sense to me except for the use of the word physically where I bolded it. Again, nothing physically is changing about the man based on his behavior. He is the same height, same build, same hair color and thickness, same facial structure, same eyes, etc.
I think what you are really saying is that you can become more or less sexually attracted to a man based on his personality and the interaction irrespective of his actual level of physical attractiveness. I totally buy that. We will never ever ever establish exactly how much physical looks matter to a woman in generating sexual attraction. My operating theory is that the variability in women when it comes to physical looks is enormous so there may be women where physical looks is 80% of sexual attraction and for other women it is 10% of sexual attraction.
I think a similar effect for men exists although it is marginal. For example, if a guy met a woman who was on the “Mendoza line” of would I fuck this woman, if she has an incredibly awesome personality it can move the needle to definitely would. In contrast, I can’t even fathom how horrible a personality someone line Marisa Miller or Kate Upton would have to have to make a guy perceive them as sexually unattractive. They could be wretched women who swear like sailors, and make fun of kids in the Special Olympics, and they still would be sexually desirable standing in front of a guy in a bikini.
Attraction: It’s About The Energy
A Scandalous You!
Are You Single? A Simple Yes Or No.
At What Age Will You Settle?
Avoiding the Superman Complex
Bar (Fly) on a Wall
Be Selfish in Love and Ask for What You Want and Need
It confuses men because many times, women will call both Eddie AND Alpha “attractive”, for the reasons we’ve set out here (mainly, not wanting to be judged as shallow, bitchy or superficial).
26
Morpheus says:
January 13, 2015 at 6:43 pm
Supposing ten random men wearing the same outfit stood in a lineup in front of me, my estimation of who was “best looking” would be entirely different then under different situational contexts. Men actually become more physically attractive in my estimation (or less so) depending. A physically good looking guy at first glance might repulse me once I get to know him, and the less classically handsome guy look like the handsomest man ever…if he has a lot of attractive personality traits. There really is no reason for me to lie about this.
This basically makes sense to me except for the use of the word physically where I bolded it. Again, nothing physically is changing about the man based on his behavior. He is the same height, same build, same hair color and thickness, same facial structure, same eyes, etc.
I think what you are really saying is that you can become more or less sexually attracted to a man based on his personality and the interaction irrespective of his actual level of physical attractiveness. I totally buy that. We will never ever ever establish exactly how much physical looks matter to a woman in generating sexual attraction. My operating theory is that the variability in women when it comes to physical looks is enormous so there may be women where physical looks is 80% of sexual attraction and for other women it is 10% of sexual attraction.
I think a similar effect for men exists although it is marginal. For example, if a guy met a woman who was on the “Mendoza line” of would I fuck this woman, if she has an incredibly awesome personality it can move the needle to definitely would. In contrast, I can’t even fathom how horrible a personality someone line Marisa Miller or Kate Upton would have to have to make a guy perceive them as sexually unattractive. They could be wretched women who swear like sailors, and make fun of kids in the Special Olympics, and they still would be sexually desirable standing in front of a guy in a bikini.